|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
25/03/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
31/07/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
Autoria: |
PASSOS, O. S.; SOARES FILHO, W. dos S.; CUNHA SOBRINHO, A. P. da; SILVA, A. C. M. da; BARBOSA, C. de J. |
Afiliação: |
ORLANDO SAMPAIO PASSOS, CNPMF; WALTER DOS SANTOS SOARES FILHO, CNPMF; ALMIR PINTO DA CUNHA SOBRINHO; AUGUSTO CESAR MOURA DA SILVA, CNPMF; CRISTIANE DE JESUS BARBOSA, CNPMF. |
Título: |
Laranjeira `Natal CNPMF 112´. |
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Cruz das Almas, BA: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, 2014. |
Páginas: |
4p. |
Descrição Física: |
il. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Planta, Folha, Fruto, Origem, Floração, Maturação, Produtividade, Material propagativo, |
Thesagro: |
Fruta cítrica; Laranja. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Citrus; Oranges. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/120929/1/Folder-Natal-CNPMF-112-01.12-7.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00681nam a2200217 a 4500 001 2012053 005 2017-07-31 008 2014 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aPASSOS, O. S. 245 $aLaranjeira `Natal CNPMF 112´.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aCruz das Almas, BA: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura$c2014 300 $a4p.$cil. 520 $aPlanta, Folha, Fruto, Origem, Floração, Maturação, Produtividade, Material propagativo, 650 $aCitrus 650 $aOranges 650 $aFruta cítrica 650 $aLaranja 700 1 $aSOARES FILHO, W. dos S. 700 1 $aCUNHA SOBRINHO, A. P. da 700 1 $aSILVA, A. C. M. da 700 1 $aBARBOSA, C. de J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
26/12/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
26/12/2016 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
Autoria: |
ARAUJO, J. C. de; TELHADO, S. F. P. e; SAKA, R. H.; LEDO, C. A. da S.; MELO, PAULO C. T. |
Afiliação: |
JACQUELINE CAMOLESE DE ARAUJO, SNE; SAMUEL FILIPE PELICANO E TELHADO, SNE; ROGÉRIO H. SAKA, CATI; CARLOS ALBERTO DA SILVA LEDO, CNPMF; PAULO C. T. MELO, ESALQ. |
Título: |
Univariate and multivariate procedures for agronomic evaluation of organically grown tomato cultivars. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Horticultura Brasileira, v. 34, n. 3, jul. - set. 2016. |
ISSN: |
0102-0536 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Tomato is one of the most important crops, the worldwide production in 2012 reached 161.8 million tons. Considering the lack of agronomic information on already available cultivars as well as on the varieties under development by breeding programs for organic systems, the objectives of this work were determine the yield components of 14 tomato cultivars in the organic system, through univariate and multivariate analysis. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications and five plants per plot. Evaluations consisted of total, marketable and non-marketable yield and number of marketable fruits per plant, in 2010. We carried out analysis of variance, using test F 5%. The effect of cultivar was fixed and the block effect was random. Then, means were ranked according to Scott-Knott 5%. Differences among cultivars were significant for total yield, number of marketable fruits per plant and marketable yield. The mean for total yield among cultivars was 51 t/ha and for marketable yield was 41 t/ha. Cultivars IAC 1 and Santa Clara were the least dissimilar (0.38). On the other hand, cultivars HTV 0601 and IAC 3 were the most dissimilar (10.63). The score dispersion graph showed two distinct groups. The second group contained cultivars HTV 0601, Granadero, Bari and Netuno, which stood out in the evaluation for the organic production system, presenting the highest total yield, marketable yield and number of marketable fruits per plant. Multivariate analysis was effective in identifying clusters of cultivars. MenosTomato is one of the most important crops, the worldwide production in 2012 reached 161.8 million tons. Considering the lack of agronomic information on already available cultivars as well as on the varieties under development by breeding programs for organic systems, the objectives of this work were determine the yield components of 14 tomato cultivars in the organic system, through univariate and multivariate analysis. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications and five plants per plot. Evaluations consisted of total, marketable and non-marketable yield and number of marketable fruits per plant, in 2010. We carried out analysis of variance, using test F 5%. The effect of cultivar was fixed and the block effect was random. Then, means were ranked according to Scott-Knott 5%. Differences among cultivars were significant for total yield, number of marketable fruits per plant and marketable yield. The mean for total yield among cultivars was 51 t/ha and for marketable yield was 41 t/ha. Cultivars IAC 1 and Santa Clara were the least dissimilar (0.38). On the other hand, cultivars HTV 0601 and IAC 3 were the most dissimilar (10.63). The score dispersion graph showed two distinct groups. The second group contained cultivars HTV 0601, Granadero, Bari and Netuno, which stood out in the evaluation for the organic production system, presenting the highest total yield, marketable yield and number of marketable fruits per plant. Multivariate analysis was effec... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Tomate. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02129naa a2200193 a 4500 001 2059273 005 2016-12-26 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0102-0536 100 1 $aARAUJO, J. C. de 245 $aUnivariate and multivariate procedures for agronomic evaluation of organically grown tomato cultivars.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aTomato is one of the most important crops, the worldwide production in 2012 reached 161.8 million tons. Considering the lack of agronomic information on already available cultivars as well as on the varieties under development by breeding programs for organic systems, the objectives of this work were determine the yield components of 14 tomato cultivars in the organic system, through univariate and multivariate analysis. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications and five plants per plot. Evaluations consisted of total, marketable and non-marketable yield and number of marketable fruits per plant, in 2010. We carried out analysis of variance, using test F 5%. The effect of cultivar was fixed and the block effect was random. Then, means were ranked according to Scott-Knott 5%. Differences among cultivars were significant for total yield, number of marketable fruits per plant and marketable yield. The mean for total yield among cultivars was 51 t/ha and for marketable yield was 41 t/ha. Cultivars IAC 1 and Santa Clara were the least dissimilar (0.38). On the other hand, cultivars HTV 0601 and IAC 3 were the most dissimilar (10.63). The score dispersion graph showed two distinct groups. The second group contained cultivars HTV 0601, Granadero, Bari and Netuno, which stood out in the evaluation for the organic production system, presenting the highest total yield, marketable yield and number of marketable fruits per plant. Multivariate analysis was effective in identifying clusters of cultivars. 650 $aTomate 700 1 $aTELHADO, S. F. P. e 700 1 $aSAKA, R. H. 700 1 $aLEDO, C. A. da S. 700 1 $aMELO, PAULO C. T. 773 $tHorticultura Brasileira$gv. 34, n. 3, jul. - set. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
Registro completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Gado de Corte; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Solos. MenosCatálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Gado de Corte; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Pantanal... Mostrar Todas |
Identificador: |
65 |
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/04/2015 |
Código do título: |
0900418 |
ISSN: |
0100-1329 |
Código CCN: |
000644-0 |
Título e Subtítulo: |
ACTA AMAZONICA. SUPLEMENTO |
Entidade: |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
Local de publicação: |
Manaus, AM |
Periodicidade: |
Trimestral |
Inicio de publicação: |
1971 |
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Acre 1976 6 (1-4); 1977 7 (1-3); 1978 8 (1 supl 1-3), (2 supl 1-3); 1979 9 (2); 1981 11 ( 3); 1985 (3/4); 1986/87 16/17; 1993 23 (1) Classificação: 581.05
Embrapa Amapá 1976 6 (1-4); 1977 7 (1-3); 1978 8 (2-3); 1982 12 (3); 1985 15 (1-4); 1986-1987 16-17 (único) ; 1993 23 (1/4)
Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental 1971 1(1-2); 1976 6(1-4); 1977 7(1-4); 1978 8(1(sup.1-2), 2(supl.1-2), 3(supl. 1-2), 4); 1979 9(1-3); 1980 10(1, 4); 1981 11(1,3); 1982 12(3); 1984 14(1-2); 1985 15(1-4); 1986-1987 16-17; 1988 18 (1-2); 1993 23 (1-4).
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental 1971 1(1-2); 1976 6(1-4); 1977 7(1-4); 1978 8(1 pt 1-2, 2 pt 1-2, 3 pt 1-2, 4); 1979 9(1-4); 1980 10(1,4); 1981 11(1,3); 1982 12(3); 1984 14(1/2); 1985 15(1-4); 1986 16; 1988 18(1/2); 1993 23(1/4) Classificação: 581.05A181
Embrapa Cerrados 1971 1(1-2); 1977 7(1,4); 1979 9(1-3); 1980 10(4); 1981 11(3); 1986/87 16/17; 1993 23(1/4) Classificação: 581.05
Embrapa Florestas 1976 6(1-4); 1977 7(1-4); 1978 8(1-4); 1979 9(4); 1980 10(1); 1982 12(3); 1984 14(1/2); 1985 15(1/2); 1986/87 16/17; 1988 18(1/2); 1993 23 (2/3)
Embrapa Gado de Corte 1976 6(SUPL 4); 1978 8(SUPL 3); 1984 [14] SUPL 1/2; 1985 15(SUPL 3/4); 1986/87 16/17 SUPL; 1988 18(SUPL 1-2); 1993 23 SUPL; Classificação: 505
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura 1971 1(1-3); 1972 2(1-3); 1973 3(1-3); 1974 4(1-3); 1985 5(1-3); 1976 6(1-4); 1977 7(1-4); 1978 8(1-4); 1979 9(1-4); 1980 10(1-4-Index); 1981 11(1-4); 1982 12(1-3); 1983 13(1-6); 1984 14(1-4); 1985 15(1-4-Index); 1986/87 16/17(1); 1988 18(1-4); 1989 19(Unico); 1990 20(Unico); 1991 21(Unico); 1992 22(1-4); 1993 23(1-4-Index); 1994 24(1-4); 1995 25(1-4); 1996 26(1-4); 1997 27(1-4); 1998 28(1-4); 1999 29(1-4); 2000 30(1-4); 2001 31(1-4); 2002 32(3); 2003 33(2-4); 2004 34(1-4); 2005 35(1-4); 2006 36(1-4); 2007 37(1-3); 2008 38(2-4 ); 2009 39(1-4); 2010 40(1-4); 2011 41(1-2-3-4); 2012 42 (1-4); 2013 43(1-2-3-4); 2014 44 (1-4); 2015 45(1-2-3-4); 2016 46 (2,3,4); 2017 47(1); 2017 47(1-4); 2018 48(1-2-3); 2019 49 (1-2-3-4) 2020 50 (1-2-3)
Embrapa Pantanal 1976 6(1-4); 1977 7(1-4); 1978 8(1(Supl1-2), 2(Supl1-2), 3(Supl1-2), 4); 1979 9(1-4); 1980 10(1,4); 1981 11(1,3); 1982 12(3); 1984 14(1/2); 1985 15(3/4); 1986/87 16/17(único); 1993 23(1/4) Classificação: 1F/2A
Embrapa Solos 1971 1(1); 1976 6(1-3); 1977 7(2,4); 1978 8(1 supl 1,3 supl 1,3 supl 2); 1980 10(4); 1981 11(1); 1982 12(3); 1984 14(1/2); 1986/87 16/17; 1988 18(1/2); 1993 23 Classificação: 581.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|